About Us |
| Home | Contact Us | | ||||||||
|
|||||||||
Product Info |
|||||||||
|
Save Time, Water and Money Compared to manual flushing methods, Hydro-Guard provides significant cost savings in equipment, maintenance and personnel. Also important, automatic flushing drastically reduces water waste as compared to hydrant flushing. Manual vs. Hydro-Guard - Annual Cost Comparison While actual savings will depend on site location, flushing frequency and labor rates, a one-time capital investment in a Hydro-Guard Unit is immediately cost-effective. Through the long life of the unit, there are exponential savings compared to the on-going costs associated with manual flushing. |
Return on Investment
|
||||||||
Case Studies |
![]() |
||||||||
| See
how Clayton County Water Authority saved money using Hydro-Guard. |
|||||||||
Technical Info |
|||||||||
| See
how the Birmngham Water Works Board saved money and time using Hydro-Guard. |
|||||||||
Learn More |
|||||||||
Manual vs. Hydro-Guard - Cost Per Flush The per flush costs of sending personnel to the problem site is understandably much higher than with the Hydro-Guard Automatic Flushing Device. Actual savings will depend on the site location, flushing frequency, labor rates and associated fuel costs. |
|||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||
|
Return on Investment Click
on this link to see how Hydro-Guard will pay for itself. |
|||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||